| Subject: Feedback from the potential future
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:57:51 +0200 From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@surfeu.at> To: lifebridgenyc@aol.com, membership@noetic.org, info@boundaryinstitute.org, shoup@boundaryinstitute.org, radin@boundaryinstitute.org, cchapman@boulder.swri.edu, harrisaw@colorado.edu, D.Bem@cornell.edu, un13@cornell.edu, gemery@cox.net, press@csicop.org, tbrun@ias.edu, email@santafe.edu Dear Colleagues: Understanding the interconnectedness of all life is the scope of my efforts since January 1972. Please see my forthcoming CD ROM "Physics of Human Intention" at http://members.aon.at/chakalov/CD.html I propose a new arrow of time, called 'universal time arrow', which is based on Ulric Neisser's Cognitive Cycle applied to the whole universe. Take a glimpse at the whole story at http://members.aon.at/chakalov/LHC.html#Holon http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Brun.html But let's put aside terminology and theories and talk about the real things. We have all kinds of theories, since the inception of the Society for Psychical Research in 1882, but failed to prevent 9/11. Science writer Gene Emery wrote (Tabloid Psychics Fail Again In 2002, December 31, 2002) at http://www.csicop.org/articles/psychic-predictions/2002.html "The September 11 terrorist attacks graphically illustrated the idea that people who claim to have psychic powers are frauds or are deluding themselves. Witness the fact that nobody predicted the destruction of the World Trade Center towers, otherwise thousands of deaths would have been averted." (...) "Here was an event whose impact resonated around the globe, yet it never resonated with the folks who tell you with great certainty where you misplaced your TV remove control." Let's get real, and put aside our emotions and prejudices. We don't need spoon-bending http://www.psiresearch.org/spoon.htm nor street magic, We need to enhance our intuition for practical purposes. It is a gut feeling which can be explained as "knowing something without knowing how we know it", but I don't think the method of enhancing this faculty of our mind should be sought in Indian mysticism, as suggested by Patanjali and reiterated by Dean Radin: "If you wish to be able to pay attention to things going on inside your head, you should pay attention to things going on inside your head. So how do you do that? Sit on a rock, close your eyes, quiet your mind, and pay attention.", Harriet Rubin (August 2000), Can we develop an ability
to have vision? Fast Company, Issue 37,
I do hope this approach will not be explored anymore (Daryl J. Bem, ANTICIPATING EMOTIONAL EVENTS: NEW EXPERIMENTS IN PRECOGNITION. IONS lecture, January 29, 2003, 7:30 PM, First Unitarian Universalist Church, 1187 Franklin at Geary, San Francisco, CA). Instead of "sitting on a rock and closing our eyes" à la Patanjali, I suggest a *brain* training based on the theory of human psyche formulated by Dmitri Uznadze http://members.aon.at/chakalov/PHI.html#Uznadze and Vassily Nalimov, V.V. NALIMOV. Realms of the Unconscious. The Enchanted Frontier, Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1982, 320 pp., http://panigada.hypermart.net/newsite/specialoffer.html NB: In order to be prepared for some anticipated event, we need to get the *context information* fully and clearly. It seems to me that this crucial requirement has not been met by any research initiative since the inception of the Society for Psychical Research in 1882 by a distinguished group of Cambridge scholars. Hence we failed to prevent 9/11. I'm located in Sofia, Bulgaria, and work alone. Unfortunately, I can not move forward without your support. Nobody can work alone in this field. Please see my email of Thu, 09 Jan 2003 22:45:19 +0200 printed below. I have not yet received any feedback. Hope to hear from you. Time is running out. Regards, Dimi Chakalov
--
Dear Colleagues: More than an hour before a jet hit World Trade Tower I, a peak of the activity of our collective consciousness was recorded. [Ref. 1] As acknowledged by Dean Radin, "There is no easy answer for why the peak in this curve occurred before the terrorist attack; the observable fact is that it did." [Ref. 2] I believe can suggest an explanation of this seemingly 'back from the future' effect in terms of anticipation, as well as a brain training for extending such effects up to the point at which the evil intentions could be technically prevented. Please see my web site and http://noosphere.global-mind.org/911formal.html Time is precious, let's not waste it. Read Thomas Cochran at http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=
Regards, Dimi
References [Ref. 1] D. Radin, Exploring Relationships Between Random Physical Events and Mass Human Attention: Asking for Whom the Bell Tolls, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 16(4), 553 (2002); cf. p. 538 and Fig. 3. ========== Subject: Re: Feedback from the potential
future
Dear Colleagues, You can read my email of Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:57:51 +0200 at http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Feedback.html Time is running out. I do hope you are not playing that Bud commercial, "Watchin' da game, ... havin' a Bud..." Hope to hear from you. Regards, Dimi
---- Note: Clicking
on "Time is running out" above will lead you to the New Scientist web site
where you can read Fred Pearce's opinion "Counting the cost of war", New
Scientist Online News, 29 January 2003,
Fred Pearce: "Besides arms, Al-Qaida
might also win hearts and minds. Few Iraqi civilians may mourn Saddam's
departure, and as a secular leader, he is no friend of fundamentalist Muslims.
But large-scale civilian casualties may anger many ordinary Arabs. That
could nourish anti-Western feeling in the Middle East and act as a recruiting
call for future terrorists. Might bin Laden be the unlikely beneficiary
of a war with Iraq?" Dimi Chakalov
See also
===== Subject: Gerard
't Hooft bet € 1000
Dear Dean, I wonder if you know that Gerard 't Hooft bet € 1000 at http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/parabet.html I think his bet is fair, justified, and totally safe. What do you think? I believe you know that I mentioned your article at http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Feedback.html#1 Recall the recent massacre in Madrid, and don't keep silent, please. The hottest places in Hell are booked for those who prefer to remain silent (after Dante, with a little 9/11 modification). Dimi
===== Subject: Night
thoughts
Dear Jessica, I spotted your name in a story about Stargate and SRI, from June 3, 2000, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=19081 What really struck me was a statement by Ms. Michelle Heaton: "I just have this gut feeling that within a short time ..." That was in June 2000, and I bet she had meant 9/11, not N. Korea. You said in your review the RVs were accurate "around 15 percent of the time", but I think the crux of the matter is not about statistics: ESP doesn't work when needed most, http://www.God-does-not-play-dice.net/Feedback.html#bet I think this is known since the time of the Roman Empire, http://www.God-does-not-play-dice.net/faq.html#Q5 I agree that in many cases, "around 15 percent of the time", RVs can help the police and military, but they failed when needed most: 9/11. My efforts are in entirely different direction, http://www.God-does-not-play-dice.net/Mallios.html#note Please recall Ms. Suzanne Padfield: "In circumstances like these I would hardly bother with probability calculations, but they would be there for sticklers on experimental protocol." http://www.God-does-not-play-dice.net/right.html#Padfield I don't want to imply that statistics is not needed; it really is. Only it may obscure the vital issue that we still don't know how to use our Collective Unconsciousness when we need it most. That is, how to harness the Synchronicity. There is a dreadful, but highly instructive story on p. 205, "Simulated Coincidence", in: Martin Plimmer and Brian King, Beyond
Coincidence, Icon Books, Cambridge, 2004, ISBN 1-84046-534-4 ,
If we want to 'get down to business', we should first study the possible *physical* nature of Synchronicity, right? If you agree, see my web site. I regret that cannot be of help. Nobody is supporting my efforts, and nobody is interested either, http://www.God-does-not-play-dice.net/Josephson.html#Bud Just some night thoughts, private and from the bottom of my heart. Please don't feel obliged to reply if you don't want to. With sincere best wishes, Dimi
===== Subject:
Re: Night thoughts
> the main crucial issue -- improve
the abilities
Enhance your Synchronicity by what you call PK, http://www.God-does-not-play-dice.net/Mallios.html#note Perception and action are separated only in textbooks. Good night. Dimi =====
The New York Times reported on April 10, 2004 that US President George W. Bush was told more than a month before the September 11, 2001 attacks that supporters of Osama bin Laden planned a strike within the United States with explosives and wanted to hijack airplanes. Citing an unnamed government official, the newspaper said the warning came in a secret briefing that Bush received at his ranch in Crawford, Texas on August 6, 2001. It also said that intelligence officials received information in May 2001, three months earlier, that indicated "a group of bin Laden supporters was planning attacks in the United States with explosives". On April 11, 2004, President George W. Bush said during a visit to Fort Hood in Texas that the August 6th memo contained "nothing about an attack on America. It talked about intentions, about somebody who hated America - well, we knew that." However, the memo specifically told Bush that Al-Qaida had reached American shores, had a support system in place and was engaging in "patterns of suspicious activity ... consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks." A classified memorandum sent around July 4, 2001, to Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, from the counter-terrorism group run by Richard Clarke, described a series of steps it said the White House had taken to put the nation on heightened terrorist alert, according to the report. Among the steps, the memorandum said, "all 56 FBI field offices were also tasked in late June to go to increased surveillance and contact with informants related to known or suspected terrorists in the United States". The New York Times article at this URL is printed below. Note that the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad has not been mentioned at all, nor the rumors that CIA station chief in Cairo has been alerted about advanced stages of executing a significant operation against an American target eight days before 9/11. Another interesting story told by the French newspaper Le Figaro is that two months before 9/11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital. He had arrived in Dubai on July 4, 2001, from Quetta in Pakistan, to be treated in the urology department. Everything went fine, as far as his precious health is concerned, only he was not arrested. Read the full story from The Guardian (Thursday, November 1, 2001), by Anthony Sampson here. Sure enough, the American hospital in Dubai immediately denied that Bin Laden was a patient there. Is this a flat lie produced by the French newspaper Le Figaro? I don't know. But let's see some facts that nobody has denied. Perhaps the most astonishing fact is that one of the recruited terrorists, a 29-year-old British Muslim from Manchester, gave himself up to Atlantic City police in the spring of 2000, eighteen months prior to 9/11. He has been extensively questioned by FBI but nobody believed his story. Nobody could even consider the possibility that FBI would not know about such a plot. The story became even more bizarre when FBI decided to put him on lie detector test. The terrorist did pass the test. He was telling the truth, according to FBI standards. But -- no. FBI could not believe that somebody could know something that they don't know. After 3 (three) weeks the final instruction from FBI Headquarters was to fly him back to Britain and pass him to their British colleagues, just before Easter 2000. This story was revealed by The Sunday Times on Sunday, May 9, 2004; see p. 1 and pp. 4-5. NBC also reported this incredible story, and even showed the face of the British Muslim. Now, look at the unclassified version of the 9/11 Commission report, which was made available by the National Archives on Thursday, February 10, 2005: The Federal Aviation Administration had 52 (fifty-two) pre-9/11 warnings (AP text here), but none of them contained even a hint to the British Muslim from Manchester! Unf******believable! And yet on April 11, 2004, we heard from President Bush that the August 6th memo contained "nothing about an attack on America." Could we have done something to stop 9/11? "Maybe. We'll never know" (Richard Clarke). Of course we'll never know, but we certainly can do better. Michael Moore has made a new movie, entitled Fahrenheit 911, but it will not help. Not at all. Talking in hindsight cannot be productive, we need to pinpoint all surreptitious evil intentions, like a cancer tumor which is being laid in the potential future (global mode of spacetime). Time is running out! "It will take another five years of work to have the kind of clandestine service our country needs" (George Tenet, Wednesday, April 14, 2004). Compare this to the chilling statement by the head of British MI5, Mrs. Eliza Manningham-Butler: "It will only be a matter of time before a crude version of a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear attack is launched at a western city" (The Sunday Times, May 9, 2004, p. 2). Are Walter Polansky (DOE), Special Agent John Beer (FBI San Diego), and other bureaucrats reading these lines? Go ahead, say something. I wasn't born in the right country, you know. F****** Bulgarian. Scheißausländer. Anyway. Of course they will keep quiet. The real problem is their firm believe that they know best. But do they? Here's something they probably do not know. If we examine in hindsight the plan of Al-Qaida, which resulted on 9/11, we would probably say that it is doomed to fail. And yet the plan was carried out with full success. By what? I believe this was a bona fide case of the phenomenon of Synchronicity. It's not necessarily a nice thing. It could make two planes to collide in the air, against all odds. It can run against every "normal" prediction based on statistics. It can even make FBI totally blind and deaf, as in the case of the British Muslim from Manchester. See Martin Plimmer and Brian King, Beyond Coincidence, Icon Books, Cambridge, 2004; UK Publication March 8, 2004, ISBN 1-84046-534-4. Most importantly, the Synchronicity
cannot be revealed and evaluated in
I'm not writing this because I hope that some physicist might pay attention to my concerns. A well-known physicist and student of Wolfgang Pauli said: "Synchronicity is something which physicists do not know about, nor would they wish to." They know best, just like FBI. It's hopeless. Unless, of course, the Synchronicity
would bring some open-minded person to this web page. You never know with
Synchronicity. See Beyond
Coincidence above. We have computers, we can converge all relevant
information to some new 'decision making agency', and now all we need is
a human brain.
D.C.
April 10, 2004
|
ASHINGTON,
April 9 -- President Bush was told more than a month before the attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001, that supporters of Osama bin Laden planned an attack
within the United States with explosives and wanted to hijack airplanes,
a government official said Friday.